Skip to main content

Exemptions from Real Property Taxation in New York State: 2022 County, City, and Town Assessment Rolls

Introduction

All real property in New York is subject to taxation unless specific legal provisions grant it exempt status, whereas personal property is not subject to taxation. Real property tax exemptions are granted on the basis of many different criteria, including the use to which the property is put, the owner's ability to pay taxes, the desire of the state and local governments to encourage certain economic or social activities, and other such considerations.1 Certain exemptions provide full relief from taxation (wholly exempt property) and others reduce the taxes which would otherwise be payable by varying degrees (partially exempt property). Some exemptions apply to taxes levied for county, city/town, and school purposes, whereas others pertain only to some of these purposes. Yet another difference involves the extent of local government autonomy: while some exemptions are mandated by state law, others are subject to local option and/or local determination of eligibility criteria.

This report presents exemption data for 2022 assessment rolls prepared by local assessors throughout New York.2 It covers town, city, and county (Tompkins and Nassau Counties) assessment rolls only; village rolls are not included.

Ultimately, the accuracy of the figures presented depends on the accuracy of the data submitted on the rolls. Although the overwhelming majority of reported exemptions could be related to specific legal provisions through the standardized reporting system provided by NYS Department of Taxation and Finance, Office of Real Property Tax Services (ORPTS), a very small percentage could not be classified because incorrect codes were used, and are thus omitted from certain tables in this report. Similarly, any errors made by assessors in determining the value of a parcel, or the extent to which this value is exempt from taxation, will appear in the data contained herein. Also, experience has shown that some assessors may not keep the values placed on wholly exempt property fully up to date, as valuation of such property has, for the most part, no effect on local tax revenue. Incorrect assessed values may overstate or understate the effect of exemptions on local tax bases.

The remainder of the report presents a summary of the 2022 statewide statistics on exempt property in graphic and tabular format, followed by Appendix A, which contains a list of abbreviations and definitions for terms used in the detailed tables that comprise Appendix B.

pie charts showing exemptions by types of owners

Table 1. Real Property tax exemptions by property group, 2022 assessment rolls

Table 1. Real Property tax exemptions, 2022 rolls
Group Number of exemptions Equalized Exempt Value ($000)
A. Residential Property other than Multiple Dwellings Non-Residential Property Owned by Certain Individuals 3,118,159 252,437,105
B. Property of New York State Government and Agencies 21,536 126,616,320
C. Property of Municipal Governments and Agencies, School Districts, BOCES, and Special Districts 114,239 243,519,385
D. Property of U.S. and Foreign Governments and Agencies, International or Interstate Agencies, and Indian Tribes 4,828 64,702,202
E. Property of Private Community Service Organizations, Social Organizations, and Professional Societies 71,628 143,831,490
F. Industrial, Commercial, and Public Service Property 19,980 81,972,758
G. Urban Renewal Property, Public Housing, and Private Subsidized Housing (Multiple Dwellings) 99,149 107,584,626
H. Agricultural and Forest Properties 115,654 12,227,096
Total, Valid Exemption Codes 3,565,173 1,032,890,982
Invalid Codes 3,794 1,554,593
TOTAL 3,568,967 1,034,445,575

Table 2. Exemptions for county purposes: Geographic areas with highest and lowest incidence of exempt value, 2022 assessment rolls

A. Ten with highest incidence
Rank Counties Cities Towns
Name Pct. exempt Name Pct. exempt Name Pct. exempt
1. Tompkins 39.15% Salamanca (Cat.) 68.59% Scriba (Osw.) 84.22%
2. Seneca 36.90% Rensselaer (Ren.) 66.79% Alfred (All.) 78.73%
3. Oswego 36.69% Albany (Alb.) 63.74% Clinton (Cli.) 75.49%
4. St Lawrence 35.96% Ithaca (Tom.) 58.92% Blenheim (Scho.) 75.14%
5. Oneida 33.69% Ogdensburg (St. L) 57.39% Romulus (Sen.) 74.11%
6. Albany 33.29% Geneva (Ont.) 56.06% Ashford (Cat.) 73.26%
7. Nassau 32.36% Syracuse (Ono.) 52.41% Marcy (One.) 72.32%
8. Wyoming 32.23% Peekskill (Wes.) 49.34% Chateaugay (Fra.) 70.72%
9 Allegany 31.47% Oneonta (Ots.) 46.97% Massena (St. L) 68.70%
10. Niagara 31.45% Little Falls (Her.) 46.21% Verona (One.) 68.19%
B. Ten with lowest incidence
Rank Counties Cities Towns
Name Pct. exempt Name Pct. exempt Name Pct. exempt
1. Hamilton 8.31% Mechanicville (Sar.) 8.14% Benson (Ham.) 1.12%
2. Putnam 9.86% Sherrill (One.) 12.18% Inlet (Ham.) 2.06%
3. Warren 10.35% Tonawanda (Eri.) 12.94% Arietta (Ham.) 2.18%
4. Saratoga 12.32% Rye (Wes.) 13.21% Stratford (Ful.) 2.89%
5. Washington 13.33% Lockport (Nia.) 13.90% Dresden (Was.) 3.06%
6. Ulster 14.09% North Tonawanda (Nia.) 15.42% Bolton (War.) 3.14%
7. Columbia 14.37% Beacon (Dut.) 15.79% Hope (Ham.) 3.16%
8. Rockland 15.77% Saratoga Springs (Sar.) 17.22% Bleecker (Ful.) 3.24%
9. Fulton 15.89% Port Jervis (Ora.) 19.74% Horicon (War.) 3.29%
10. Delaware 16.26% Lackawanna (Eri.) 20.45% Ellicottville (Cat.) 3.34%

Table 3. Exemptions for county purposes: Counties ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2022 assessment rolls*

Table 3. Exemptions for county purposes: Counties ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2022 rolls*
Rank County No. of exemptions Exempt value ($000) Pct. of value exempt
1. Tompkins 6,899 5,971,442 39.15%
2. Seneca 4,979 1,653,131 36.90%
3. Oswego 10,450 4,107,842 36.69%
4. St Lawrence 12,748 3,808,265 35.96%
5. Oneida 21,703 7,515,015 33.69%
6. Albany 19,919 15,731,371 33.29%
7. Nassau 463,405 122,843,486 32.36%
8. Wyoming 6,977 1,389,983 32.23%
9. Allegany 7,345 1,184,404 31.47%
10. Niagara 19,105 7,369,725 31.45%
11. Schoharie 5,132 1,314,724 30.81%
12. Cattaraugus 10,776 2,100,158 28.18%
13. Jefferson 11,583 3,486,425 27.64%
14. Tioga 5,095 1,130,141 26.69%
15. Rensselaer 12,371 4,954,724 26.46%
16. Yates 4,605 1,150,711 26.44%
17. Broome 14,289 4,144,458 26.38%
18. Montgomery 6,210 1,068,945 25.80%
19. Franklin 5,212 1,492,440 24.78%
20. Onondaga 36,750 11,364,538 24.33%
21. Livingston 7,496 1,526,942 24.26%
22. Genesee 8,265 1,200,487 24.01%
23. Chautauqua 16,099 2,815,751 23.98%
24. Clinton 9,278 1,905,120 23.81%
25. Lewis 5,159 763,649 23.38%
26. Steuben 14,143 2,102,152 23.15%
27. Orleans 5,578 667,891 22.83%
28. Cayuga 9,607 1,756,652 22.70%
29. Sullivan 8,833 3,188,304 22.55%
30. Schenectady 10,306 3,599,417 22.31%
31. Madison 8,627 1,429,682 22.05%
32. Cortland 5,149 820,797 21.87%
33. Westchester 31,636 58,548,728 21.83%
34. Ontario 10,745 3,087,806 20.82%
35. Otsego 6,928 1,403,864 20.76%
36. Chenango 6,174 749,971 20.15%
37. Chemung 6,920 1,336,902 19.89%
38. Suffolk 115,728 101,377,541 19.86%
39. Dutchess 19,087 9,940,716 19.78%
40. Herkimer 6,640 1,325,494 19.32%
41. Wayne 9,626 1,603,690 19.05%
42. Erie 74,720 19,602,325 18.91%
43. Greene 5,124 1,890,363 18.53%
44. Orange 24,262 10,221,569 18.37%
45. Schuyler 3,366 427,190 18.14%
46. Monroe 48,426 12,492,033 18.00%
47. Essex 5,356 1,729,383 17.94%
48. Delaware 5,235 1,345,049 16.26%
49. Fulton 5,090 830,264 15.89%
50. Rockland 15,017 9,114,472 15.77%
51. Columbia 7,467 1,915,548 14.37%
52. Ulster 14,602 4,358,836 14.09%
53. Washington 8,257 923,598 13.33%
54. Saratoga 15,116 4,623,087 12.32%
55. Warren 6,565 1,551,617 10.35%
56. Putnam 6,386 1,855,436 9.86%
57. Hamilton 885 286,068 8.31%
*Excludes New York City boroughs; New York City data included in Table 4

Table 4. Exemptions for county purposes: Cities ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2022 assessment rolls

Table 4. Exemptions for county purposes: Cities ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2022 rolls
Rank City No. of exemptions Exempt value ($000) Pct. of value exempt
1. Salamanca 1,452 239,768 68.59%
2. Rensselaer 485 1,124,443 66.79%
3. Albany 6,292 10,753,754 63.74%
4. Ithaca 829 3,498,195 58.92%
5. Ogdensburg 850 403,690 57.39%
6. Geneva 776 700,315 56.06%
7. Syracuse 7,064 6,383,592 52.41%
8. Peekskill 740 2,415,069 49.34%
9. Oneonta 529 476,569 46.97%
10. Little Falls 334 174,321 46.21%
11. Watervliet 371 419,551 46.15%
12. Rome 2,903 1,320,884 45.95%
13. Troy 1,997 2,012,557 45.86%
14. Niagara Falls 3,925 1,742,514 45.77%
15. Jamestown 2,149 497,812 39.36%
16. Elmira 1,566 498,222 38.35%
17. Schenectady 3,617 1,792,805 37.67%
18. Yonkers 5,368 14,030,621 36.71%
19. Oswego 953 531,458 36.30%
20. Cortland 790 365,526 36.10%
21. Utica 3,807 1,276,567 35.68%
22. Canandaigua 547 458,284 35.06%
23. Norwich 347 140,046 34.91%
24. Binghamton 2,374 948,522 34.71%
25. Olean 1,160 300,667 34.69%
26. Watertown 1,578 602,705 32.32%
27. Plattsburgh 1,133 502,069 31.48%
28. White Plains 1,267 4,939,621 30.89%
29. Glen Cove 7,670 1,887,227 30.34%
30. Amsterdam 1,282 286,579 30.24%
31. Auburn 1,686 537,178 30.01%
32. Poughkeepsie 1,087 952,948 29.87%
33. Johnstown 550 235,736 29.63%
34. Oneida 1,141 240,446 29.20%
35. Buffalo 19,241 6,285,321 28.99%
36. Dunkirk 1,068 188,532 28.94%
37. Rochester 10,065 3,308,722 28.54%
38. Newburgh 844 590,389 28.02%
39. New Rochelle 1,850 4,532,439 27.39%
40. Hudson 448 323,586 27.21%
41. New York City 624,264 441,853,666 25.78%
42. Long Beach 9,366 2,082,292 25.74%
43. Mt Vernon 1,350 2,522,240 25.70%
44. Kingston 1,412 821,338 25.69%
45. Hornell 741 109,434 25.47%
46. Gloversville 977 145,721 25.27%
47. Corning 763 248,279 25.22%
48. Fulton 767 140,847 23.95%
49. Batavia 1,056 230,726 23.81%
50. Glens Falls 966 401,555 23.65%
51. Cohoes 881 324,150 22.80%
52. Middletown 1,051 554,303 21.27%
53. Lackawanna 1,459 215,806 20.45%
54. Port Jervis 511 141,102 19.74%
55. Saratoga Springs 1,193 1,266,044 17.22%
56. Beacon 667 331,556 15.79%
57. North Tonawanda 3,044 415,061 15.42%
58. Lockport 1,234 188,824 13.90%
59. Rye 442 1,531,150 13.21%
60. Tonawanda 1,506 140,919 12.94%
61. Sherrill 57 35,052 12.18%
62. Mechanicville 218 26,679 8.14%

Table 5. Exemptions for county purposes: Towns with over 50 percent full value exempt, 2022 assessment rolls

Table 5. Exemptions for county purposes: Towns with over 50 percent full value exempt, 2022 rolls
Rank Town No. of exemptions Exempt value ($000) Pct. of value exempt
1. Scriba (Osw.) 642 2,372,343 84.22%
2. Alfred (All.) 312 469,675 78.73%
3. Clinton (Cli.) 235 180,351 75.49%
4. Blenheim (Scho.) 141 154,167 75.14%
5. Romulus (Sen.) 410 746,730 74.11%
6. Ashford (Cat.) 368 532,936 73.26%
7. Marcy (One.) 602 1,637,923 72.32%
8. Chateaugay (Fra.) 431 275,705 70.72%
9. Massena (St. L) 1,092 1,288,546 68.70%
10. Verona (One.) 947 906,220 68.19%
11. Greenwood (Ste.) 283 140,660 66.53%
12. Lewiston (Nia.) 1,366 3,315,863 66.53%
13. Dover (Dut.) 519 1,716,948 65.52%
14. Wethersfield (Wyo.) 320 135,589 64.74%
15. Le Ray (Jef.) 787 1,062,993 63.72%
16. Orangeville (Wyo.) 302 196,543 60.92%
17. Tyre (Sen.) 310 134,072 60.20%
18. Nichols (Tio.) 264 221,772 59.86%
19. Arkwright (Cha.) 207 130,614 59.43%
20. Harrisburg (Lew.) 259 59,073 55.62%
21. Athens (Gre.) 459 763,820 53.83%
22. Eaton (Mad.) 656 281,286 53.80%
23. Martinsburg (Lew.) 433 123,541 53.56%
24. Eagle (Wyo.) 372 94,821 53.34%
25. Delhi (Del.) 327 439,707 52.60%
26. Cherry Creek (Cha.) 246 81,179 52.12%
27. Sheldon (Wyo.) 602 207,477 52.09%
28. Fairfield (Her.) 348 122,199 51.30%
29. Sharon (Scho.) 380 148,379 50.95%
30. Jasper (Ste.) 405 85,638 50.76%

Table 6. Geographic areas with highest and lowest incidence of local-option exempt value, 2022 assessment rolls

A. Ten with highest incidence
Rank Counties Cities Towns
Name Pct. local-option* Name Pct. local-option* Name Pct. local-option*
1. Fulton 23.17% Johnstown (Ful.) 40.36% Ontario (Way.) 61.60%
2. Hamilton 19.63% Saratoga Springs (Sar.) 27.63% Shelter Island (Suf.) 50.78%
3. Oswego 18.38% Auburn (Cay.) 25.85% Lake Pleasant (Ham.) 45.11%
4. Wayne 17.83% Lackawanna (Eri.) 19.42% Chautauqua (Cha.) 43.89%
5. Saratoga 16.14% Buffalo (Eri.) 17.66% Watson (Lew.) 40.02%
6. Washington 15.27% Tonawanda (Eri.) 17.45% Rhinebeck (Dut.) 39.35%
7. Putnam 14.82% North Tonawanda (Nia.) 15.34% Jewett (Gre.) 39.16%
8. Warren 14.30% Sherrill (One.) 14.44% Warren (Her.) 35.86%
9. Monroe 14.26% Hudson (Col.) 14.35% Madison (Mad.) 35.65%
10. Columbia 14.19% Newburgh (Ora.) 13.83% Piercefield (St. L) 33.56%
B. Ten with lowest incidence
Rank Counties Cities Towns
Name Pct. local-option* Name Pct. local-option* Name Pct. local-option*
1. Tompkins 3.02% Ithaca (Tom.) 1.51% Red House (Cat.) 0.00%
2. Wyoming 3.75% Little Falls (Her.) 2.09% Alfred (All. 0.47%
3. Yates 4.01% Albany (Alb.) 2.32% Blenheim (Scho.) 0.51%
4. Allegany 4.18% White Plains (Wes.) 2.49% Delhi (Del.) 0.69%
5. Delaware 4.60% Rensselaer (Ren.) 2.62% Clinton (Cli.) 0.70%
6. Seneca 4.66% Peekskill (Wes.) 2.81% Harrisburg (Lew.) 0.70%
7. Schoharie 5.26% Binghamton (Bro.) 2.90% Romulus (Sen.) 0.77%
8. Schuyler 5.27% Ogdensburg (St. L) 3.06% Dover (Dut.) 0.81%
9. St Lawrence 5.41% Watervliet (Alb.) 3.13% Bombay (Fra.) 0.82%
10. Franklin 5.51% Oswego (Osw.) 3.41% Arkwright (Cha.) 0.83%
*Exempt value of local-option exemptions divided by total exempt value.

Table 7. Exempt value attributable to local option, counties ranked by percent of exempt value, 2022 assessment rolls

Table 7. Exempt value attributable to local option, counties ranked by percent of exempt value, 2022 rolls
Rank County Exempt value local option ($000) Total exempt value ($000) Pct. of value exempt
1. Fulton 311,913 1,346,465 23.17%
2. Hamilton 68,428 348,673 19.63%
3. Oswego 939,906 5,113,002 18.38%
4. Wayne 444,909 2,495,669 17.83%
5. Saratoga 1,090,746 6,757,753 16.14%
6. Washington 224,658 1,471,334 15.27%
7. Putnam 429,168 2,895,032 14.82%
8. Warren 302,881 2,118,116 14.30%
9. Monroe 2,556,857 17,924,433 14.26%
10. Columbia 354,898 2,501,560 14.19%
11. Erie 3,848,363 27,440,364 14.02%
12. Ulster 759,975 5,925,683 12.83%
13. Rockland 1,570,470 12,382,389 12.68%
14. Onondaga 1,814,822 14,662,691 12.38%
15. Cayuga 296,409 2,413,952 12.28%
16. Orange 1,487,766 13,010,672 11.43%
17. Rensselaer 680,609 6,139,515 11.09%
18. Dutchess 1,348,887 12,410,826 10.87%
19. Orleans 110,667 1,042,403 10.62%
20. Suffolk 12,523,995 119,907,952 10.44%
21. Nassau 15,338,308 147,168,597 10.42%
22. Cortland 119,981 1,191,680 10.07%
23. Chautauqua 390,977 3,954,406 9.89%
24. Schenectady 459,008 4,746,405 9.67%
25. Madison 189,714 2,043,701 9.28%
26. Greene 227,952 2,490,851 9.15%
27. Broome 511,699 5,747,922 8.90%
28. Clinton 223,722 2,525,403 8.86%
29. Essex 172,181 2,055,633 8.38%
30. Lewis 79,642 1,015,400 7.84%
31. Livingston 158,021 2,020,913 7.82%
32. Chenango 93,328 1,196,919 7.80%
33. Ontario 304,511 4,045,509 7.53%
34. Otsego 145,695 1,948,468 7.48%
35. Herkimer 140,912 1,909,577 7.38%
36. Montgomery 110,600 1,525,512 7.25%
37. Genesee 123,867 1,720,137 7.20%
38. Westchester 4,971,397 69,285,321 7.18%
39. Sullivan 258,858 3,740,701 6.92%
40. Jefferson 289,769 4,197,535 6.90%
41. Steuben 202,427 2,933,058 6.90%
42. Tioga 109,023 1,608,539 6.78%
43. Oneida 632,230 9,507,769 6.65%
44. Chemung 135,467 2,056,225 6.59%
45. Cattaraugus 165,050 2,777,274 5.94%
46. Niagara 548,478 9,348,858 5.87%
47. Albany 1,019,630 17,689,394 5.76%
48. Franklin 104,179 1,889,137 5.51%
49. St Lawrence 254,961 4,711,221 5.41%
50. Schuyler 32,257 611,573 5.27%
51. Schoharie 85,914 1,633,181 5.26%
52. Seneca 91,418 1,960,828 4.66%
53. Delaware 83,907 1,825,062 4.60%
54. Allegany 66,579 1,592,108 4.18%
55. Yates 54,885 1,369,728 4.01%
56. Wyoming 65,281 1,739,945 3.75%
57. Tompkins 196,038 6,498,933 3.02%

Table 8. City/Town distribution of exempt value attributable to local option exemptions: 2022 assessment rolls

Table 8. City/Town distribution of exempt value attributable to local option exemptions: 2022 rolls
Percent of value in local option exemptions Number of cities/towns Percent of cities/towns
0 - 9.99 583 58.593%
10 - 19.99 340 34.171%
20 - 29.99 58 5.829%
30 - 39.99 8 0.804%
40 or more 6 0.603%

1 Most exemptions are granted under Article 4 of the Real Property Tax Law, but others are authorized by a wide variety of statutes ranging from the Agriculture and Markets Law to the Transportation Law.

2The material in the report relates to exemptions only. Not covered are the restricted assessments which apply to certain types of property (e.g., condominiums), tax abatement programs, and formerly real property which has been statutorily redefined as personal (non-taxable) property (e.g., certain switching equipment owned by telephone companies). Restricted assessments, tax abatements, and statutory redefinitions, like exemptions, are tax expenditures in that they reduce or shift tax liability.

| Table of contents | Top of page |

Updated: